| |
|
I know there is no hard evidence to prove this theory, but many stables, including myself, have reporting seeing a strong trend of decreasing foal ratings after doing their first 3 to 4 matches of the month. Is this a real thing? please help!! |
|  |
|
| |
|
Have always seen this. So I believe it is a thing |
|  |
|
| |
|
Yes! 🙌 My 1st was a EWE 2nd WWW 3rd EEE 4th WWW Then after (I had 11 matches-) All I got was an EEE colt and PEE combos |
|  |
|
| |
|
This is what I think too! But so many people are adamant about disproving it. And Eve says there's no code in place to make it do that I believe. |
| |
|
| |
|
Not real. Most people do their most exciting and most promising matches first. Pretty sure staff has disproven this several times. Plus, why would they code that? It seems silly and pointless. |
|
|
| |
|
I don't really believe in the first 4 matches resulting in better foals. From my experience theres no real difference if you breed your top matches first or last. |
|  |
|
| |
|
Ellsworths Eden said:
Not real. Most people do their most exciting and most promising matches first. Pretty sure staff has disproven this several times. Plus, why would they code that? It seems silly and pointless.
I think it could totally make sense to code it. It'd help ensure WWWs don't get oversatured (like EEEs did in the past) and regulate monopolies, of stables who have tons of ebs, over the LBs. |
| |
|
| |
Trivia Team
|
I dont know if it is a thing but it seems like the more foals you breed the more RF varies. For the most part I get my best foals on the first 3 but I also breed my "best/strongest" first. On the other hand, I got just junk on my first 3 RID matches (with svens) while a WWW came on match 5 (without item). I still think that quality beats quantity when it comes to breeding though. |
|  |
|
| |
|
I guess? Maybe I'm just a hardened disbeliever since it just makes sense to me that it wouldn't be a thing.
Florestä said:
Ellsworths Eden said:
Not real. Most people do their most exciting and most promising matches first. Pretty sure staff has disproven this several times. Plus, why would they code that? It seems silly and pointless.
I think it could totally make sense to code it. It'd help ensure WWWs don't get oversatured (like EEEs did in the past) and regulate monopolies, of stables who have tons of ebs, over the LBs.
|
|
|
| |
|
I often do some shit matches before my main ones while I wait for straws to be sent out(I'm impatient xD) and the main ones still turn out fine despite being 7th or later Also when I do actually do the big ones first, they flop, but the random shit pairings later do great x'D |
|  |
|
Clear with Temps dropping into the Teens
